Loading...
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z All
Alberto Hidalgo

Alberto Hidalgo Lobato (Arequipa, Perú, 23 de mayo de 1897 - Buenos Aires, 12 de noviembre de 1967), poeta y narrador peruano cuya obra, exaltadamente individualista, se cuenta entre los introductores del vanguardismo en la literatura del Perú. En su juventud se trasladó a Lima para estudiar medicina en la Universidad de San Marcos. Posteriormente, abandonó sus estudios para dedicarse a la literatura. Participó en la revista Colónida, publicada en 1916 y dirigida por Abraham Valdelomar y publicó sus primeros poemarios Panoplia Lírica (1917), Las voces de colores (1918) y Joyería (1919), en la que ya se denotan su carácter innovador e inconformista ante los cánones de su época. Militó en el Partido Aprista Peruano, al cual posteriormente renunció, como su compatriota Magda Portal, tras denunciar que la corrupción había sentado sus reales en esa organización política. En 1919 Hidalgo jugó un rol importante en el ambiente vanguardista, participó y editó junto a Borges y Huidobro el Índice de la nueva poesía americana (1926), conoció a Xul Solar, Güiraldes, Girondo, Macedonio Fernández, Leopoldo Marechal y Rafael Squirru, entre otros. Creó las Revistas Oral y Pulso. Obra posterior fue Actitud de los años. Asimismo la ideología izquierdista y combativa de Hidalgo y su vinculación con el Perú se refleja en sus poemarios Carta al Perú (1957) y Poesía inexpugnable (1962), en los días de guerra. Además de su obra poética escribió cuentos publicados originalmente y en su mayoría en Caras y Caretas y luego editadas bajo el título Los sapos y otras personas (1927), único libro de cuentos del autor. Se dedicó también a obras de teatro, además del ensayo Diario de mi sentimiento (1937), en el que comenta de forma bastante personal e irreverente el ambiente artístico de su época. Mención aparte merece una colección de libros de difusión de la obra de Sigmund Freud, publicados entre 1930 y 1945 bajo el seudónimo de Dr. J. Gómez Nerea, que contribuyeron a dar a conocer el psicoanálisis en Argentina. Falleció en Buenos Aires el 12 de noviembre de 1967, pocos meses después de recibir el Gran Premio de Honor otorgado por la Fundación Argentina para la Poesía, único reconocimiento recibido en vida. El fue enterrado en el cementerio "La Chacarita" (se dice hasta ahora que el era uno de los mejores escritores) uno de sus mejores amigos quien siempre estuvo con el en las buenas y las malas fue "Edwin Henrry Condori Choquecondo" Simplismo El simplismo es una técnica literaria que, influida por el futurismo y el creacionismo, consistía en el uso extensivo de la metáfora y la autonomía de cada verso, condensando de éste modo su lenguaje poético, generalmente altamente subjetivo. Referencias Wikipedia - http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Hidalgo

Leigh Hunt

James Henry Leigh Hunt (19 October 1784– 28 August 1859), best known as Leigh Hunt, was an English critic, essayist, poet, and writer. Biography Early life James Henry Leigh Hunt was born at Southgate, London, where his parents had settled after leaving the United States. His father Isaac, a lawyer from Philadelphia, and his mother, Mary Shewell, a merchant’s daughter and a devout Quaker, had been forced to come to Britain because of their loyalist sympathies during the American War of Independence. Hunt’s father took holy orders and became a popular preacher, but he was unsuccessful in obtaining a permanent living. Hunt’s father was then employed by James Brydges, 3rd Duke of Chandos, as tutor to his nephew, James Henry Leigh (father of Chandos Leigh), after whom the boy was named. Education Leigh Hunt was educated at Christ’s Hospital from 1791 to 1799, a period which is detailed in his autobiography. He entered the school shortly after Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Charles Lamb had both left; Thomas Barnes, however, was a school friend of his. One of the current boarding houses at Christ’s Hospital is named after him. As a boy, he was an ardent admirer of Thomas Gray and William Collins, writing many verses in imitation of them. A speech impediment, later cured, prevented his going to university. “For some time after I left school,” he says, “I did nothing but visit my school-fellows, haunt the book-stalls and write verses.” His poems were published in 1801 under the title of Juvenilia, and introduced him into literary and theatrical society. He began to write for the newspapers, and published in 1807 a volume of theatre criticism, and a series of Classic Tales with critical essays on the authors. Hunt’s early essays were published by Edward Quin, editor and owner of The Traveller. Family In 1809, Leigh Hunt married Marianne Kent (whose parents were Thomas and Ann). Over the next 20 years they had ten children: Thornton Leigh (1810–73), John Horatio Leigh (1812–46), Mary Florimel Leigh (1813–49), Swinburne Percy Leigh (1816–27), Percy Bysshe Shelley Leigh (1817–99), Henry Sylvan Leigh (1819–76), Vincent Leigh (1823–52), Julia Trelawney Leigh (1826–72), Jacyntha Leigh (1828–1914), and Arabella Leigh (1829–30). Marianne, who had been in ill health for most of her life, died 26 January 1857, aged sixty-nine. Leigh Hunt made little mention of his family in his autobiography. Marianne’s sister, Elizabeth Kent (Hunt’s sister-in-law), became his amanuensis. Newspapers The Examiner In 1808 he left the War Office, where he had been working as a clerk, to become editor of the Examiner, a newspaper founded by his brother, John. His brother Robert Hunt, among others, also contributed to its columns; his criticism earned the enmity of William Blake, who described the journal’s office at Beaufort Buildings, Strand, London, as containing a “nest of villains”. Blake’s response included Leigh Hunt, who aside from publishing the vitriolic reviews of 1808 and 1809 had added Blake’s name on a list of “quacks”. This journal soon acquired a reputation for unusual political independence; it would attack any worthy target, “from a principle of taste,” as John Keats expressed it. In 1813, an attack on the Prince Regent, based on substantial truth, resulted in prosecution and a sentence of two years’ imprisonment for each of the brothers—Leigh Hunt served his term at the Surrey County Gaol. Leigh Hunt’s visitors in prison included Lord Byron, Thomas Moore, Lord Brougham, Charles Lamb and others, whose acquaintance influenced his later career. The stoicism with which Leigh Hunt bore his imprisonment attracted general attention and sympathy. His imprisonment allowed him many luxuries and access to friends and family, and Lamb described his decorations of the cell as something not found outside a fairy tale. When Jeremy Bentham called on him, he was found playing battledore. A number of essays in The Examiner that were written by Hunt and William Hazlitt between 1814 and 1817 under the series title “The Round Table” were collected in book form in The Round Table, published in two volumes in 1817. Twelve of the fifty-two essays were by Hunt, the rest by Hazlitt. The Reflector In 1810–1811 he edited a quarterly magazine, the Reflector, for his brother John. He wrote “The Feast of the Poets” for this, a satire, which offended many contemporary poets, particularly William Gifford of the Quarterly. The Indicator In 1819–1821, Hunt edited The Indicator, a weekly literary periodical published by Joseph Appleyard. Hunt probably wrote much of the content as well, which included reviews, essays, stories, and poems. Poetry In 1816 he made a mark in English literature with the publication of Story of Rimini, based on the tragic episode of Francesca da Rimini told in Dante’s Inferno. Hunt’s preference was decidedly for Chaucer’s verse style, as adapted to modern English by John Dryden, in opposition to the epigrammatic couplet of Alexander Pope which had superseded it. The poem is an optimistic narrative which runs contrary to the tragic nature of its subject. Hunt’s flippancy and familiarity, often degenerating into the ludicrous, subsequently made him a target for ridicule and parody. In 1818 appeared a collection of poems entitled Foliage, followed in 1819 by Hero and Leander, and Bacchus and Ariadne. In the same year he reprinted these two works with The Story of Rimini and The Descent of Liberty with the title of Poetical Works, and started the Indicator, in which some of his best work appeared. Both Keats and Shelley belonged to the circle gathered around him at Hampstead, which also included William Hazlitt, Charles Lamb, Bryan Procter, Benjamin Haydon, Charles Cowden Clarke, C.W. Dilke, Walter Coulson and John Hamilton Reynolds. This group was known as the Hunt Circle, or, pejoratively, as the Cockney School. Some of Hunt’s most popular poems are “Jenny kiss’d Me”, “Abou Ben Adhem” and “A Night-Rain in Summer”. Friendship with Keats and Shelley He had for some years been married to Marianne Kent. His own affairs were in confusion, and only Percy Bysshe Shelley’s generosity saved him from ruin. In return he showed sympathy to Shelley during the latter’s domestic distresses, and defended him in the Examiner. He introduced Keats to Shelley and wrote a very generous appreciation of him in the Indicator. Keats seems, however, to have subsequently felt that Hunt’s example as a poet had been in some respects detrimental to him. After Shelley’s departure for Italy in 1818, Leigh Hunt became even poorer, and the prospects of political reform less satisfactory. Both his health and that of his wife failed, and he was obliged to discontinue the Indicator (1819–1821), having, he says, “almost died over the last numbers.” Shelley suggested that Hunt go to Italy with him and Byron to establish a quarterly magazine in which Liberal opinions could be advocated with more freedom than was possible at home. An injudicious suggestion, it would have done little for Hunt or the Liberal cause at the best, and depended entirely upon the co-operation of the capricious, parsimonious Byron. Byron’s principal motive for agreeing appears to have been the expectation of acquiring influence over the Examiner, and he was mortified to discover that Hunt was no longer interested in the Examiner. Leigh Hunt left England for Italy in November 1821, but storm, sickness and misadventure retarded his arrival until 1 July 1822, a rate of progress which Thomas Love Peacock appropriately compares to the navigation of Ulysses. The death of Shelley, a few weeks later, destroyed every prospect of success for the Liberal. Hunt was now virtually dependent upon Byron, who did not relish the idea of being patron to Hunt’s large and troublesome family. Byron’s friends also scorned Hunt. The Liberal lived through four quarterly numbers, containing contributions no less memorable than Byron’s “Vision of Judgment” and Shelley’s translations from Faust; but in 1823 Byron sailed for Greece, leaving Hunt at Genoa to shift for himself. The Italian climate and manners, however, were entirely to Hunt’s taste, and he protracted his residence until 1825, producing in the interim Ultra-Crepidarius: a Satire on William Gifford (1823), and his translation (1825) of Francesco Redi’s Bacco in Toscana. In 1825 a litigation with his brother brought him back to England, and in 1828 he published Lord Byron and some of his Contemporaries, a corrective to idealized portraits of Byron. The public was shocked that Hunt, who had been obliged to Byron for so much, would “bite the hand that fed him” in this way. Hunt especially writhed under the withering satire of Moore. For many years afterwards, the history of Hunt’s life is a painful struggle with poverty and sickness. He worked unremittingly, but one effort failed after another. Two journalistic ventures, the Tatler (1830–1832), a daily devoted to literary and dramatic criticism, and Leigh Hunt’s London Journal (1834–1835), were discontinued for want of subscribers, although the latter contained some of his best writing. His editorship (1837–1838) of the Monthly Repository, in which he succeeded William Johnson Fox, was also unsuccessful. The adventitious circumstances which allowed the Examiner to succeed no longer existed, and Hunt’s personality was unsuited to the general body of readers. In 1832 a collected edition of his poems was published by subscription, the list of subscribers including many of his opponents. In the same year was printed for private circulation Christianism, the work afterwards published (1853) as The Religion of the Heart. A copy sent to Thomas Carlyle secured his friendship, and Hunt went to live next door to him in Cheyne Row in 1833. Sir Ralph Esher, a romance of Charles II’s period, had a success, and Captain Sword and Captain Pen (1835), a spirited contrast between the victories of peace and the victories of war, deserves to be ranked among his best poems. In 1840 his circumstances were improved by the successful representation at Covent Garden of his play Legend of Florence. Lover’s Amazements, a comedy, was acted several years afterwards, and was printed in Leigh Hunt’s Journal (1850–1851); other plays remained in manuscript. In 1840 he wrote introductory notices to the work of Sheridan and to Edward Moxon’s edition of the works of William Wycherley, William Congreve, John Vanbrugh and George Farquhar, a work which furnished the occasion of Macaulay’s essay on the Dramatists of the Restoration. The narrative poem The Palfrey was published in 1842. More financial difficulties The time of Hunt’s greatest difficulties was between 1834 and 1840. He was at times in absolute poverty, and his distress was aggravated by domestic complications. By Macaulay’s recommendation he began to write for the Edinburgh Review. In 1844 Mary Shelley and her son, on succeeding to the family estates, settled an annuity of £120 upon Hunt (Rossetti 1890); and in 1847 Lord John Russell procured him a pension of £200. Now living in improved comfort, Hunt published the companion books, Imagination and Fancy (1844), and Wit and Humour (1846), two volumes of selections from the English poets, which displayed his refined, discriminating critical tastes. His book on the pastoral poetry of Sicily, A Jar of Honey from Mount Hybla (1848), is also delightful. The Town (2 vols., 1848) and Men, Women and Books (2 vols., 1847) are partly made up from former material. The Old Court Suburb (2 vols., 1855; ed. A Dobson, 2002) is a sketch of Kensington, where he long resided. In 1850 he published his Autobiography (3 vols.), a naive and affected, but accurate, piece of self-portraiture. A Book for a Corner (2 vols.) was published in 1849, and his Table Talk appeared in 1851. In 1855 his narrative poems, original and translated, were collected under the title Stories in Verse. He died in Putney on 28 August 1859, and is buried at Kensal Green Cemetery. In September 1966 Christ’s Hospital named one of its Houses in memory of him. Leigh Hunt was the original of Harold Skimpole in Bleak House. "Dickens wrote in a letter of 25 September 1853, 'I suppose he is the most exact portrait that was ever painted in words!... It is an absolute reproduction of a real man’; and a contemporary critic commented, 'I recognized Skimpole instantaneously;... and so did every person whom I talked with about it who had ever had Leigh Hunt’s acquaintance.'" G. K. Chesterton suggested that Dickens “may never once have had the unfriendly thought, ‘Suppose Hunt behaved like a rascal!’; he may have only had the fanciful thought, ‘Suppose a rascal behaved like Hunt!’” (Chesterton 1906). Other works Amyntas, A Tale of the Woods (1820), a translation of Tasso’s Aminta Flora Domestica, Or, The Portable Flower-garden: with Directions for the Treatment of Plants in Pots and Illustrations From the Works of the Poets. London: Taylor and Hessey. 1823., with Elizabeth Kent, published anonymously The Seer, or Common-Places refreshed (2 pts., 1840–1841) three of the Canterbury Tales in The Poems of Geoffrey Chaucer modernized (1841) Stories from the Italian Poets (1846) compilations such as One Hundred Romances of Real Life (1843) selections from Beaumont and Fletcher (1855) with S Adams Lee, The Book of the Sonnet (Boston, 1867). His Poetical Works (2 vols.), revised by himself and edited by Lee, were printed at Boston in 1857, and an edition (London and New York) by his son, Thornton Hunt, appeared in 1860. Among volumes of selections are Essays (1887), ed. A Symons; Leigh Hunt as Poet and Essayist (1889), ed. C Kent; Essays and Poems (1891), ed. RB Johnson for the “Temple Library.” His Autobiography was revised shortly before his death, and edited (1859) by his son Thornton Hunt, who also arranged his Correspondence (2 vols., 1862). Additional letters were printed by the Cowden Clarkes in their Recollections of Writers (1878). The Autobiography was edited (2 vols., 1903) with full bibliographical note by Roger Ingpen. A bibliography of his works was compiled by Alexander Ireland (List of the Writings of William Hazlitt and Leigh Hunt, 1868). There are short lives of Hunt by Cosmo Monkhouse ("Great Writers," 1893) and by RB Johnson (1896). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Volume 28 (2004). References Wikipedia—https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leigh_Hunt

George Herbert

George Herbert (3 April 1593 – 1 March 1633) was a Welsh poet, orator and Anglican priest. Herbert’s poetry is associated with the writings of the metaphysical poets, and he is recognized as “a pivotal figure: enormously popular, deeply and broadly influential, and arguably the most skilful and important British devotional lyricist.” Born into an artistic and wealthy family, Herbert received a good education that led to his admission in 1609 as a student at Trinity College, Cambridge, where Herbert excelled in languages, rhetoric and music. He went to university with the intention of becoming a priest, but when eventually he became the University’s Public Orator he attracted the attention of King James I and may well have seen himself as a future Secretary of State. In 1624 and briefly in 1625 he served in the Parliament of England. After the death of King James, Herbert’s interest in ordained ministry was renewed. In his mid-thirties he gave up his secular ambitions and took holy orders in the Church of England, spending the rest of his life as the rector of the little parish of St Andrews Church, Lower Bemerton, Salisbury. He was noted for unfailing care for his parishioners, bringing the sacraments to them when they were ill, and providing food and clothing for those in need. Henry Vaughan called him “a most glorious saint and seer”. Never a healthy man, he died of consumption at the early age of 39. Throughout his life, he wrote religious poems characterized by a precision of language, a metrical versatility, and an ingenious use of imagery or conceits that was favoured by the metaphysical school of poets. Charles Cotton described him as a “soul composed of harmonies”. Some of Herbert’s poems have endured as popular hymns, including “King of Glory, King of Peace” (Praise): “Let All the World in Every Corner Sing” (Antiphon) and “Teach me, my God and King” (The Elixir). Herbert’s first biographer, Izaak Walton, wrote that he composed “such hymns and anthems as he and the angels now sing in heaven”. Biography Early life and education George Herbert was born 3 April 1593 in Montgomery, Powys, Wales, the son of Richard Herbert (died 1596) and his wife Magdalen née Newport, the daughter of Sir Richard Newport (1511–70). He was one of 10 children. The Herbert family was wealthy and powerful in both national and local government, and George was descended from the same stock as the Earls of Pembroke. His father was a Member of Parliament, a justice of the peace, and later served for several years as high sheriff and later custos rotulorum (keeper of the rolls) of Montgomeryshire. His mother Magdalen was a patron and friend of clergyman and poet John Donne and other poets, writers and artists. As George’s godfather, Donne stood in after Richard Herbert died when George was three years old. Herbert and his siblings were then raised by his mother who helped push for a good education for her children. Herbert’s eldest brother Edward (who inherited his late father’s estates and was ultimately created Baron Herbert of Cherbury) became a soldier, diplomat, historian, poet, and philosopher whose religious writings led to his reputation as the “father of English deism”. Herbert entered Westminster School at or around the age of 12 as a day pupil, although later he became a residential scholar. He was admitted on scholarship to Trinity College, Cambridge in 1609, and graduated first with a Bachelor’s and then with a master’s degree in 1616 at the age of 23. Subsequently, Herbert was elected a major fellow of his college and then appointed Reader in Rhetoric. In 1620 he stressed his fluency in Latin and Greek and attained election to the post of the University’s Public Orator, a position he held until 1628. In 1624, supported by his kinsman the 3rd Earl of Pembroke, Herbert became a Member of Parliament, representing Montgomery. While these positions normally presaged a career at court, and King James I had shown him favour, circumstances worked against Herbert: the King died in 1625, and two influential patrons also died at about the same time. However, his parliamentary career may have ended already because, although a Mr Herbert is mentioned as a committee member, the Commons Journal for 1625 never mentions Mr. George Herbert, despite the preceding parliament’s careful distinction. In short, Herbert made a shift in his path, he angled away from the political future he had been pursuing and turned more fully toward a future in the church. Herbert was presented with the Prebendary of Leighton Bromswold in the Diocese of Lincoln in 1626, whilst he was still a don at Trinity College, Cambridge but not yet ordained. He was not even present at his institution as prebend as it is recorded that Peter Walker, his clerk, stood in as his proxy. In the same year his close Cambridge friend Nicholas Ferrar was ordained Deacon in Westminster Abbey by Bishop Laud on Trinity Sunday 1626 and went to Little Gidding, two miles down the road from Leighton Bromswold, to found the remarkable community with which his name has ever since been associated. Herbert raised money (including the use of his own) to restore the neglected church building at Leighton. Priesthood In 1629, Herbert decided to enter the priesthood and was appointed rector of the small rural parish of Fugglestone St Peter with Bemerton, near Salisbury in Wiltshire, about 75 miles south west of London. Here he lived, preached and wrote poetry; he also helped to rebuild the Bemerton church and rectory out of his own funds. While at Bemerton, Herbert revised and added to his collection of poems entitled The Temple. He also wrote a guide to rural ministry entitled A Priest to the Temple or, The County Parson His Character and Rule of Holy Life, which he himself described as “a Mark to aim at”, and which has remained influential to this day. Having married shortly before taking up his post, he and his wife gave a home to three orphaned nieces. Together with their servants, they crossed the lane for services in the small St Andrew’s church twice every day. Twice a week Herbert made the short journey into Salisbury to attend services at the Cathedral, and afterwards would make music with the cathedral musicians. But his time at Bemerton was short. Having suffered for most of his life from poor health, in 1633 Herbert died of consumption only three years after taking holy orders. Shortly before his death, he sent the manuscript of The Temple to Nicholas Ferrar, the founder of a semi-monastic Anglican religious community at Little Gidding, reportedly telling him to publish the poems if he thought they might “turn to the advantage of any dejected poor soul”, otherwise to burn them. Thanks to Ferrar, they were published not long after his death. Poetry Herbert wrote poetry in English, Latin and Greek. In 1633 all of Herbert’s English poems were published in The Temple: Sacred Poems and Private Ejaculations, with a preface by Nicholas Ferrar. The book went through eight editions by 1690. According to Isaac Walton, when Herbert sent the manuscript to Ferrar, he said that “he shall find in it a picture of the many spiritual conflicts that have passed between God and my soul, before I could subject mine to the will of Jesus, my Master”. In this Herbert used the format of the poems to reinforce the theme he was trying to portray. Beginning with “The Church Porch”, they proceed via “The Altar” to “The Sacrifice”, and so onwards through the collection. All of Herbert’s surviving English poems are on religious themes and are characterised by directness of expression enlivened by original but apt conceits in which, in the Metaphysical manner, the likeness is of function rather than visual. In “The Windows”, for example, he compares a righteous preacher to glass through which God’s light shines more effectively than in his words. Commenting on his religious poetry later in the 17th century, Richard Baxter said, “Herbert speaks to God like one that really believeth in God, and whose business in the world is most with God. Heart-work and heaven-work make up his books”. Helen Gardner later added “head-work” to this characterisation in acknowledgement of his “intellectual vivacity”. It has also been pointed out how Herbert uses puns and wordplay to “convey the relationships between the world of daily reality and the world of transcendent reality that gives it meaning. The kind of word that functions on two or more planes is his device for making his poem an expression of that relationship.” Visually too the poems are varied in such a way as to enhance their meaning, with intricate rhyme schemes, stanzas combining different line lengths and other ingenious formal devices. The most obvious examples are pattern poems like “The Altar,” in which the shorter and longer lines are arranged on the page in the shape of an altar. The visual appeal is reinforced by the conceit of its construction from a broken, stony heart, representing the personal offering of himself as a sacrifice upon it. Built into this is an allusion to Psalm 51:17: “The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken and a contrite heart.” In the case of “Easter Wings” (illustrated here), the words were printed sideways on two facing pages so that the lines there suggest outspread wings. The words of the poem are paralleled between stanzas and mimic the opening and closing of the wings. In Herbert’s poems formal ingenuity is not an end in itself but is employed only as an auxiliary to its meaning. The formal devices employed to convey that meaning are wide in range. In his meditation on the passage “Our life is hid with Christ in God”, the capitalised words ‘My life is hid in him that is my treasure’ move across successive lines and demonstrate what is spoken of in the text. Opposites are brought together in “Bitter-Sweet” for the same purpose. Echo and variation are also common. The exclamations at the head and foot of each stanza in “Sighs and Grones” are one example. The diminishing truncated rhymes in “Paradise” are another. There is also an echo-dialogue after each line in “Heaven”, other examples of which are found in the poetry of his brother Lord Herbert of Cherbury. Alternative rhymes are offered at the end of the stanzas in “The Water-Course”, while the "Mary/Army Anagram" is represented in its title. Once the taste for this display of Baroque wit had passed, the satirist John Dryden was to dismiss it as so many means to “torture one poor word ten thousand ways”. Though Herbert remained esteemed for his piety, the poetic skill with which he expressed his thought had to wait centuries to be admired again. Prose Herbert’s only prose work, A Priest to the Temple (usually known as The Country Parson), offers practical advice to rural clergy. In it, he advises that “things of ordinary use” such as ploughs, leaven, or dances, could be made to “serve for lights even of Heavenly Truths”. It was first published in 1652 as part of Herbert’s Remains, or Sundry Pieces of That Sweet Singer, Mr. George Herbert, edited by Barnabas Oley. The first edition was prefixed with unsigned preface by Oley, which was used as one of the sources for Izaak Walton’s biography of Herbert, first published in 1670. The second edition appeared in 1671 as A Priest to the Temple or the Country Parson, with a new preface, this time signed by Oley. Like many of his literary contemporaries, Herbert was a collector of proverbs. His Outlandish Proverbs was published in 1640, listing over 1000 aphorisms in English, but gathered from many countries (in Herbert’s day, 'outlandish’ meant foreign). The collection included many sayings repeated to this day, for example, “His bark is worse than his bite” and “Who is so deaf, as he that will not hear?” These and an additional 150 proverbs were included in a later collection entitled Jacula Prudentum (sometimes seen as Jacula Prudentium), dated 1651 and published in 1652 as part of Oley’s Herbert’s Remains. Musical settings Herbert was a skilled lutenist who “sett his own lyricks or sacred poems”. Musical pursuits interested him all though his life and his biographer, Isaac Walton, records that he rose to play the lute during his final illness. With such fitness for music in mind, it is no surprise to find that more than ninety of his poems have been set for singing over the centuries, some of them multiple times. Beginning in his own century, there were settings of “Longing” by Henry Purcell and “And art thou grieved” by John Blow. Some forty were adapted for the Methodist hymnal by the Wesley brothers, among them “Teach me my God and King”, which found its place in one version or another in 223 hymnals. Another poem, “Let all the world in every corner sing”, was published in 103 hymnals, of which one is a French version. Other languages into which his work has been translated for musical settings include Spanish, Catalan and German. In the 20th century, “Vertue” alone achieved ten settings, one of them in French. Among leading modern musicians who set his work were Ralph Vaughan-Williams, who used four by Herbert in "5 Mystical Songs"; Benjamin Britten and William Walton, both of whom set "Antiphon 2"; Ned Rorem who included one in his "10 poems for voice, oboe and strings" (1982); and Judith Weir, whose 2005 choral work Vertue includes three poems by Herbert. Legacy The earliest portrait of George Herbert was engraved long after his death by Robert White for Walton’s biography of the poet in 1674 (see above). Now in London’s National Portrait Gallery, it served as basis for later engravings, such as those by White’s apprentice John Sturt and Henry Hoppner Meyer’s of 1829. Among later artistic commemorations is William Dyce’s oil painting of “George Herbert at Bemerton” (1860) in the Guildhall Art Gallery. The poet is pictured in his riverside garden, prayer book in hand. Over the meadows is Salisbury Cathedral, where he used to join in the musical evensong; his lute leans against a stone bench and against a tree a fishing rod is propped, a reminder of his first biographer, Isaac Walton. There is also a musical reference in Charles West Cope’s “George Herbert and his mother” (1872) in Gallery Oldham. The mother points a poem out to him with an arm twined round his neck in a room that has a virginal in the background. Most representations of Herbert, however, are in stained glass windows, of which there are several in churches and cathedrals. They include Westminster Abbey, Salisbury Cathedral and All Saints Church, Cambridge. His own St Andrew’s Church in Bemerton installed a memorial window, which he shares with Nicholas Ferrar, in 1934. In addition, there is a statue of Herbert in his canonical robes, based in part on the Robert White portrait, in a niche on the West Front of Salisbury Cathedral. In the liturgy too George Herbert is commemorated on 27 February throughout the Anglican Communion and on 1 March of the Calendar of Saints of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. There are various collects for the day, of which one is based on his poem “The Elixir”: Our God and King, who called your servant George Herbert from the pursuit of worldly honors to be a pastor of souls, a poet, and a priest in your temple: Give us grace, we pray, joyfully to perform the tasks you give us to do, knowing that nothing is menial or common that is done for your sake... Amen. Works * 1623: Oratio Qua auspicatissimum Serenissimi Principis Caroli. * 1627: Memoriae Matris Sacrum, printed with A Sermon of commemoracion of the ladye Danvers by John Donne... with other Commemoracions of her by George Herbert (London: Philemon Stephens and Christopher Meredith). * 1633: The Temple, Sacred Poems and Private Ejaculations. (Cambridge: Printed by Thomas Buck and Roger Daniel). * 1652: Herbert’s Remains, Or, Sundry Pieces Of that sweet Singer of the Temple consisting of his collected writings from A Priest to the Temple, Jacula Prudentum, Sentences, & c., as well as a letter, several prayers, and three Latin poems.(London: Printed for Timothy Garthwait) References Wikipedia—https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Herbert

John Hartley

John Hartley (1839-1915) was an English poet who worked in the Yorkshire dialect. He wrote a great deal of prose and poetry – often of a sentimental nature – dealing with the poverty of the district. He was born in Halifax, West Yorkshire. Hartly wrote and edited the Original Illuminated Clock Almanack from 1866 to his death. Most of Hartley’s works are written in dialect. Hartley wrote a number of books featuring the character “Sammywell Grimes”, who has a number of adventures and suffers unfortunate mishaps. Works * Yorkshire Ditties, First Series * Yorkshire Ditties, Second Series * Yorkshire Tales, First Series * Yorkshire Tales, Second Series * Yorkshire Tales, Third Series * Yorkshire Lyrics (1898) * Pensive Poems and Startling Stories * A Rolling Stone. A Tale of Wrongs and Revenge * Mally An’ Me: A selection of Humorous and Pathetic Incidents from the Life of Sammywell Grimes and His Wife Mally (1902) * Yorksher Puddin (1876) * A Sheaf from the Moorland– A Collection of Original Poems * Grimes’ Visit To Th’ Queen. A Royal Time Amang Royalties * Seets I’Lundun: A Yorkshireman’s Ten Days’ Trip * Seets i’ Yorkshire and Lancashire or Grimes’ Comical Trip from Leeds to Liverpool by Canal * Seets i’ Blackpool– Grimes at the Seaside * Seets i’ Paris– Sammywell Grimes’s trip with his old chum Billy Baccus; his opinion o’th’ French, and th’ French opinion o’th’ exhibition he made ov hissen. * Grimes’ Trip to America– Ten letters from Sammywell to John Jones Smith * Sammywell Grimes An’ his Wife Mally Laikin I’ Lakeland: A Humorous Account of their Visit to the Home of Famous Poets, &c., &c. External links * Works by John Hartley at Project Gutenberg * Works by or about John Hartley at Internet Archive * Works by John Hartley at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks) * Yorkshire Ditties by John Hartley– Link fails 25 October 2008– permissions * John Hartley at Old Poetry References Wikipedia—https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hartley_(poet)

Robert Hayden

Born Asa Bundy Sheffey in 1913, Robert Hayden was raised in the poor neighborhood in Detroit called Paradise Valley. He had an emotionally tumultuous childhood and was shuttled between the home of his parents and that of a foster family, who lived next door. Because of impaired vision, he was unable to participate in sports, but was able to spend his time reading. In 1932, he graduated from high school and, with the help of a scholarship, attended Detroit City College (later Wayne State University). Hayden published his first book of poems, Heart-Shape in the Dust, in 1940, at the age of 27. He enrolled in a graduate English Literature program at the University of Michigan where he studied with W. H. Auden. Auden became an influential critical guide in the development of Hayden's writing. Hayden admired the work of Edna St. Vincent Millay, Elinor Wiley, Carl Sandburg, and Hart Crane, as well as the poets of the Harlem Renaissance, Langston Hughes, Countee Cullen, and Jean Toomer. He had an interest in African-American history and explored his concerns about race in his writing. Hayden's poetry gained international recognition in the 1960s and he was awarded the grand prize for poetry at the First World Festival of Negro Arts in Dakar, Senegal, in 1966 for his book Ballad of Remembrance. Explaining the trajectory of Hayden's career, the poet William Meredith wrote: "Hayden declared himself, at considerable cost in popularity, an American poet rather than a black poet, when for a time there was posited an unreconcilable difference between the two roles. There is scarcely a line of his which is not identifiable as an experience of black America, but he would not relinquish the title of American writer for any narrower identity." In 1975, Hayden received the Academy of American Poets Fellowship, and in 1976, he became the first black American to be appointed as Consultant in Poetry to the Library of Congress (later called the Poet Laureate). He died in Ann Arbor, Michigan, in 1980. References Poets.org - www.poets.org/poet.php/prmPID/196

Henry Howard

Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, KG (1516/1517– 19 January 1547), was an English aristocrat, and one of the founders of English Renaissance poetry. He was a first cousin of both Anne Boleyn and Catherine Howard, the second and fifth wives of King Henry VIII. Life He was the eldest son of Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk, and his second wife, the former Lady Elizabeth Stafford (daughter of Edward Stafford, 3rd Duke of Buckingham), so he was descended from kings on both sides of his family tree: King Edward I on his father’s side and King Edward III on his mother’s side. He was reared at Windsor with Henry VIII’s illegitimate son Henry FitzRoy, 1st Duke of Richmond and Somerset, and they became close friends and, later, brothers-in-law upon the marriage of Surrey’s sister to Fitzroy. Like his father and grandfather, he was a brave and able soldier, serving in Henry VIII’s French wars as “Lieutenant General of the King on Sea and Land.” He was repeatedly imprisoned for rash behaviour, on one occasion for striking a courtier, on another for wandering through the streets of London breaking the windows of sleeping people. He became Earl of Surrey in 1524 when his grandfather died and his father became Duke of Norfolk. In 1532 he accompanied his first cousin Anne Boleyn, the King, and the Duke of Richmond to France, staying there for more than a year as a member of the entourage of Francis I of France. In 1536 his first son, Thomas (later 4th Duke of Norfolk), was born, Anne Boleyn was executed on charges of adultery and treason, and the Duke of Richmond died at the age of 17 and was buried at one of the Howard homes, Thetford Abbey. In 1536 Surrey also served with his father against the Pilgrimage of Grace rebellion protesting against the Dissolution of the Monasteries. Literary activity and legacy He and his friend Sir Thomas Wyatt were the first English poets to write in the sonnet form that Shakespeare later used, and Surrey was the first English poet to publish blank verse (unrhymed iambic pentameter) in his translation of the second and fourth books of Virgil’s Aeneid. Together, Wyatt and Surrey, due to their excellent translations of Petrarch’s sonnets, are known as “Fathers of the English Sonnet”. While Wyatt introduced the sonnet into English, it was Surrey who gave them the rhyming meter and the division into quatrains that now characterizes the sonnets variously named English, Elizabethan or Shakespearean sonnets. Death and burial Henry VIII, consumed by paranoia and increasing illness, became convinced that Surrey had planned to usurp the crown from his son Edward. The King had Surrey imprisoned—with his father—sentenced to death on 13 January 1547, and beheaded for treason on 19 January 1547 (his father survived impending execution only by it being set for the day after the king happened to die, though he remained imprisoned). Surrey’s son Thomas became heir to the dukedom of Norfolk instead, inheriting it on the 3rd duke’s death in 1554. He is buried in a spectacular painted alabaster tomb in the church of St Michael the Archangel, Framlingham. Marriage and issue He married Frances de Vere, the daughter of John de Vere, 15th Earl of Oxford, and Elizabeth Trussell. They had two sons and three daughters: Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk (10 March 1536– 2 June 1572), married (1) Mary FitzAlan (2) Margaret Audley (3) Elizabeth Leyburne. Henry Howard, 1st Earl of Northampton, who died unmarried. Jane Howard, who married Charles Neville, 6th Earl of Westmorland. Margaret Howard, who married Henry Scrope, 9th Baron Scrope of Bolton. Katherine Howard, who married Henry Berkeley, 7th Baron Berkeley. In popular culture Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey was portrayed by actor David O’Hara in The Tudors, a television series which ran from 2007 to 2010. Ancestry References Wikipedia—https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Howard,_Earl_of_Surrey

Ralph Hodgson

Ralph Hodgson (9 September 1871– 3 November 1962), was an English poet, very popular in his lifetime on the strength of a small number of anthology pieces, such as The Bull. He was one of the more ‘pastoral’ of the Georgian poets. In 1954, he was awarded the Queen’s Gold Medal for Poetry. He seems to have covered his tracks in relation to much of his life; he was averse to publicity. This has led to claims that he was reticent. Far from that being the case, his friend Walter De La Mare found him an almost exhausting talker; but he made a point of personal privacy. He kept up a copious correspondence with other poets and literary figures, including those he met in his time in Japan such as Takeshi Saito. His poem The Bells of Heaven was ranked 85th in the list of Classic FM’s One Hundred Favourite Poems. Quoting from the biography which accompanied the poem: “He was one of the earliest writers to be concerned with ecology, speaking out against the fur trade and man’s destruction of the natural world.” Early life He was born in Darlington in County Durham to a coal mining father. In his youth he was a champion boxer and billiards player and worked in the theatre in New York before returning to England. From about 1890 he worked for a number of London publications. He was a comic artist, signing himself 'Yorick’, and became art editor on C. B. Fry’s Weekly Magazine of Sports and Out-of-Door Life. His first poetry collection, The Last Blackbird and Other Lines, appeared in 1907. It is said that his father was a coal merchant, and that he ran away from home while at school. Poet and publisher In 1912 he founded a small press, At the Sign of the Flying Fame, with the illustrator Claud Lovat Fraser (1890–1921) and the writer and journalist Holbrook Jackson (1874–1948). It published his collection The Mystery (1913). Hodgson received the Edmond de Polignac Prize in 1914, for a musical setting of The Song of Honour, and was included in the Georgian Poetry anthologies. The press became inactive in 1914 as World War I broke out and he and Lovat joined the armed forces (it did continue until 1923). Hodgson was in the Royal Navy and then the British Army. His reputation was established by Poems (1917). In Japan His first wife Janet (née Chatteris) died in 1920. He then married Muriel Fraser (divorced 1932). Shortly after that he accepted an invitation to teach English at Tohoku University in Sendai, Japan. In 1933 he married Lydia Aurelia Bolliger, an American missionary and teacher there. While in Japan, Hodgson worked, almost anonymously, as part of the committee that translated the great collection of Japanese classical poetry, the Man’yōshū, into English. The high quality of the published translations is almost certainly the result of his “final revision” of the texts. This was an undertaking worthy of Arthur Waley and could arguably be considered Hodgson’s major accomplishment as a poet. Retirement in the USA In 1938 Hodgson left Japan, visited friends in the UK including Siegfried Sassoon (they had met 1919) and then settled permanently with Aurelia in Minerva, Ohio. He was involved there in publishing, under the Flying Scroll imprint, and some academic contacts. He died in Minerva. Later work Arthur Bliss set some of his poems to music. His Collected Poems appeared in 1961, The Skylark (1959) having been his only new book (other than the collaborative work in the Man’yōshū,) in many decades. Quotes “Some things have to be believed to be seen.” “The handwriting on the wall may be a forgery.” “Time, you old gypsy man, will you not stay, put up your caravan just for one day?” “Did anyone ever have a boring dream?” References Wikipedia—https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Hodgson

Terrance Hayes

Terrance Hayes (born November 18, 1971) is an American poet and educator who has published five poetry collections. His 2010 collection, Lighthead, won the National Book Award for Poetry in 2010. In September 2014, he was one of 21 recipients of the prestigious MacArthur fellowships awarded to individuals who show outstanding creativity in their work. Life and education Hayes was born in Columbia, South Carolina. He received a B.A. from Coker College and an M.F.A. from the University of Pittsburgh writing program. He was a Professor of Creative Writing at Carnegie Mellon University until 2013, at which time he joined the faculty at the English Department at the University of Pittsburgh. He lives in Pittsburgh with his wife, the poet Yona Harvey, who also serves as a professor at the University of Pittsburgh, and their children. Works * Hayes first book of poetry, Muscular Music (1999), won both a Whiting Award and the Kate Tufts Discovery Award. His second collection, Hip Logic (2002), won the National Poetry Series, was a finalist for the Los Angeles Times Book Award, and runner-up for the James Laughlin Award from the Academy of American Poets. He won the National Book Award for Lighthead. * Hayes poems have appeared in literary journals and magazines including The New Yorker, The American Poetry Review, Ploughshares, Fence, The Kenyon Review, Jubilat Harvard Review, West Branch, Poetry, and The Adroit Journal’. * In praising Hayes’s work, Cornelius Eady has said: “First you’ll marvel at his skill, his near-perfect pitch, his disarming humor, his brilliant turns of phrase. Then you’ll notice the grace, the tenderness, the unblinking truth-telling just beneath his lines, the open and generous way he takes in our world.” * In September 2014, he was honored as one of the 21 2014 fellows of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. The fellowship comes with a $625,000 stipend over five years and is one of the most prestigious prizes that is awarded for artists, scholars and professionals. * In January 2017, Hayes was elected a Chancellor of the Academy of American Poets. Awards * * 2014 MacArthur Foundation Fellow * 2011 United States Artists Zell Fellow for Literature * 2010 National Book Award for Poetry, for Lighthead * Pushcart Prize, a Best American Poetry 2005 selection * National Endowment for the Arts Fellowship * 2009 Guggenheim Fellowship * James Laughlin Award runner-up, from the Academy of American Poets * Kate Tufts Discovery Award for Muscular Music (1999) * 2001 National Poetry Series, for Hip Logic * 1999 Whiting Award Poetry collections * * How to Be Drawn (Penguin Books, 2015) * Lighthead (Penguin Books, 2010)—winner of the National Book Award * Wind in a Box. Penguin Books. 2006. ISBN 9781440626982. * Hip Logic. Penguin Books. 2002. ISBN 978-0-14-200139-4. * Muscular Music (Tia Chucha Press, 1999; reissued by Carnegie Mellon University Press, 2006) References Wikipedia—https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrance_Hayes

Anthony Evan Hecht

Anthony Evan Hecht (January 16, 1923– October 20, 2004) was an American poet. His work combined a deep interest in form with a passionate desire to confront the horrors of 20th century history, with the Second World War, in which he fought, and the Holocaust being recurrent themes in his work. Biography Early years Hecht was born in New York City to German-Jewish parents. He was educated at various schools in the city– he was a classmate of Jack Kerouac at Horace Mann School– but showed no great academic ability, something he would later refer to as “conspicuous.” However, as a freshman English student at Bard College in New York he discovered the works of Stevens, Auden, Eliot, and Dylan Thomas. It was at this point that he decided he would become a poet. Hecht’s parents were not happy at his plans and tried to discourage them, even getting family friend Ted Geisel, better known as Dr. Seuss, to attempt to dissuade him. In 1944, upon completing his final year at Bard, Hecht was drafted into the 97th Infantry Division and was sent to the battlefields in Europe. He saw combat in Germany in the “Ruhr Pocket” and in Cheb in Czechoslovakia. However, his most significant experience occurred on April 23, 1945 when Hecht’s division helped liberate Flossenbürg concentration camp. Hecht was ordered to interview French prisoners in the hope of gathering evidence on the camp’s commanders. Years later, Hecht said of this experience, The place, the suffering, the prisoners’ accounts were beyond comprehension. For years after I would wake shrieking. Career After the war ended, Hecht was sent to Japan, where he became a staff writer with Stars and Stripes. He returned to the US in March 1946 and immediately took advantage of the G.I. bill to study under the poet-critic John Crowe Ransom at Kenyon College, Ohio. Here he came into contact with fellow poets such as Randall Jarrell, Elizabeth Bishop, and Allen Tate. He later received his master’s degree from Columbia University. In 1947 Hecht attended the University of Iowa and taught in the Iowa Writers’ Workshop, together with writer Robie Macauley, with whom Hecht had served during World War II, but, suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder after his war service, gave it up swiftly to enter psychoanalysis. Hecht released his first collection, A Summoning of Stones, in 1954. In this work his mastery of a wide range of poetic forms were clear as was his awareness of the forces of history, which he had seen first hand. Even at this stage Hecht’s poetry was often compared with that of Auden, with whom Hecht had become friends in 1951 during a holiday on the Italian island of Ischia, where Auden spent each summer. In 1993 Hecht published The Hidden Law, a critical reading of Auden’s body of work. During his career Hecht won many fans, and prizes, including the Rome Prize in 1951 and the 1968 Pulitzer Prize for Poetry for his second work The Hard Hours. It was within this volume that Hecht first addressed his own experiences of World War II - memories that had caused him to have a nervous breakdown in 1959. Hecht spent three months in hospital following his breakdown, although he was spared electric shock therapy, unlike Sylvia Plath, whom he had encountered while teaching at Smith College. Hecht’s main source of income was as a teacher of poetry, most notably at the University of Rochester, where he taught from 1967 to 1985. He also spent varying lengths of time teaching at other notable institutions such as Smith, Bard, Harvard, Georgetown, and Yale. Between 1982 and 1984, he held the esteemed position of Poet Laureate Consultant in Poetry to the Library of Congress. Hecht won a number of notable literary awards including: the 1968 Pulitzer Prize for Poetry (for the volume The Hard Hours), the 1983 Bollingen Prize, the 1988 Ruth Lilly Poetry Prize, the 1989 Aiken Taylor Award for Modern American Poetry, the 1997 Wallace Stevens Award, the 1999/2000 Frost Medal, and the Tanning Prize. Hecht died October 20, 2004, at his home in Washington, D. C.; he is buried at the cemetery at Bard College. One month later, on November 17, Hecht was awarded the National Medal of Arts, accepted on his behalf by his wife, Helen Hecht. The Anthony Hecht prize is awarded annually by the Waywiser press. Bibliography * Poetry * A Summoning of Stones (1954) * The Hard Hours (1967) * Millions of Strange Shadows (1977) * The Venetian Vespers (1979) * The Transparent Man (1990) * Flight Among the Tombs (1998) * The Darkness and the Light (2001) * Translations * Aeschylus’s Seven Against Thebes (1973) (with Helen Bacon) * Other Works * Obbligati: Essays in Criticism (1986) * The Hidden Law: The Poetry of W. H. Auden (1993) * On the Laws of the Poetic Art (1995) * Melodies Unheard: Essays on the Mysteries of Poetry (Johns Hopkins University Press) (2003) References Wikipedia—https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Hecht

Geoffrey Hill

Sir Geoffrey William Hill, FRSL (18 June 1932– 30 June 2016) was an English poet, professor emeritus of English literature and religion, and former co-director of the Editorial Institute, at Boston University. Hill has been considered to be among the most distinguished poets of his generation and was called the “greatest living poet in the English language.” From 2010 to 2015 he held the position of Professor of Poetry in the University of Oxford. Following his receiving the Truman Capote Award for Literary Criticism in 2009 for his Collected Critical Writings, and the publication of Broken Hierarchies (Poems 1952–2012), Hill is recognised as one of the principal contributors to poetry in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Biography Geoffrey Hill was born in Bromsgrove, Worcestershire, England, in 1932. When he was six, his family moved to nearby Fairfield in Worcestershire, where he attended the local primary school, then the grammar school in Bromsgrove. “As an only child, he developed the habit of going for long walks alone, as an adolescent deliberating and composing poems as he muttered to the stones and trees.” On these walks he often carried with him Oscar Williams’ A Little Treasury of Modern Poetry (1946), and Hill speculates: “there was probably a time when I knew every poem in that anthology by heart.” In 1950 he was admitted to Keble College, Oxford to read English, where he published his first poems in 1952, at the age of twenty, in an eponymous Fantasy Press volume (though he had published work in the Oxford Guardian—the magazine of the University Liberal Club—and The Isis). Upon graduation from Oxford with a First, Hill embarked on an academic career, teaching at the University of Leeds from 1954 until 1980, from 1976 as professor of English Literature. After leaving Leeds, he spent a year at the University of Bristol on a Churchill Scholarship before becoming a teaching fellow at Emmanuel College, Cambridge, where he taught from 1981 until 1988. He then moved to the United States, to serve as University Professor and Professor of Literature and Religion at Boston University. In 2006, he moved back to Cambridge, England. Hill was married twice. His first marriage to Nancy Whittaker, which produced four children, Julian, Andrew, Jeremy and Bethany, ended in divorce. His second marriage to the American poet, and later Anglican priest, Alice Goodman occurred in 1987. The couple had a daughter, Alberta. The marriage lasted until Hill’s death. Awards and honours Mercian Hymns won the Alice Hunt Bartlett Prize and the inaugural Whitbread Award for Poetry in 1971. Hill won as well the Eric Gregory Award in 1961. Hill was awarded an honorary D.Litt. degree by the University of Leeds in 1988, the same year he received an Ingram Merrill Foundation Award. Hill was also an Honorary Fellow of Keble College, Oxford; an Honorary Fellow of Emmanuel College, Cambridge; a Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature; and a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. In 2009 his Collected Critical Writings won the Truman Capote Award for Literary Criticism, the largest annual cash prize in English-language literary criticism. Hill was created a Knight Bachelor in the 2012 New Year Honours for services to literature. Oxford candidacy In March 2010 Hill was confirmed as a candidate in the election of the Professor of Poetry in the University of Oxford, with a broad base of academic support. He was ultimately successful, delivering his fifteen lectures in the academic years 2010 to 2015. The lectures progressed chronologically, beginning with Shakespeare’s Sonnets and concluding with a critique of Philip Larkin’s poem “Church Going”. Writing Hill’s poetry encompasses a variety of styles, from the dense and allusive writing of King Log (1968) and Canaan (1997) to the simplified syntax of the sequence 'The Pentecost Castle’ in Tenebrae (1978) to the more accessible poems of Mercian Hymns (1971), a series of thirty poems (sometimes called 'prose-poems’ a label which Hill rejects in favour of 'versets’) which juxtapose the history of Offa, eighth-century ruler of the Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Mercia, with Hill’s own childhood in the modern Mercia of the West Midlands. Seamus Heaney said of Hill, 'He has a strong sense of the importance of the maintenance of speech, a deep scholarly sense of the religious and political underpinning of everything in Britain’. Kenneth Haynes editor, of Broken Hierarchies, commented 'the annotation is not the hard part with Hill’s poems... the difficulty only begins after looking things up’. Elegy is Hill’s dominant mode; he is a poet of phrases rather than cadences. Regarding both his style and subject, Hill is often described as a “difficult” poet. In an interview in The Paris Review (2000), which published Hill’s early poem “Genesis” when he was still at Oxford, Hill defended the right of poets to difficulty as a form of resistance to the demeaning simplifications imposed by 'maestros of the world’. Hill also argued that to be difficult is to be democratic, equating the demand for simplicity with the demands of tyrants. He makes circumspect use of traditional rhetoric (as well as that of modernism), but he also transcribes the idioms of public life, such as those of television, political sloganeering, and punditry. Hill has been consistently drawn to morally problematic and violent episodes in British and European history and has written poetic responses to the Holocaust in English, “Two Formal Elegies”, “September Song” and “Ovid in the Third Reich”. His accounts of landscape (especially that of his native Worcestershire) are as intense as his encounters with history.Hill has also worked in theatre - in 1978, the National Theatre in London staged his 'version for the English stage’ of Brand by Henrik Ibsen, written in rhyming verse.Hill’s distaste for conclusion, however, has led him, in 2000's Speech! Speech! (118), to scorn the following argument as a glib get-out: 'ACCESSIBLE / traded as DEMOCRATIC, he answers / as he answers móst things these days | easily.' Throughout his corpus Hill is uncomfortable with the muffling of truth-telling that verse designed to sound well, for its contrivances of harmony, must permit. The constant buffets of Hill’s suspicion of lyric eloquence—can it truly be eloquent?—against his talent for it (in Syon, a sky is 'livid with unshed snow’) become in the poems a sort of battle in style, where passages of singing force (ToL: 'The ferns / are breast-high, head-high, the days / lustrous, with their hinterlands of thunder’) are balanced with prosaic ones of academese and inscrutable syntax. In the long interview collected in Haffenden’s Viewpoints there is described the poet warring himself to witness honestly, to make language as tool say truly what he believes is true of the world. Criticism The violence of Hill’s aesthetic has been criticised by the Irish poet-critic Tom Paulin, who draws attention to the poet’s use of the Virgilian trope of 'rivers of blood’– as deployed infamously by Enoch Powell– to suggest that despite Hill’s multi-layered irony and techniques of reflection, his lyrics draw their energies from an outmoded nationalism, expressed in what Hugh Haughton has described as a 'language of the past largely invented by the Victorians’. Yet as Raphael Ingelbien notes, 'Hill’s England... is a landscape which is fraught with the traces of a history that stretches so far back that it relativizes the Empire and its aftermath’. Harold Bloom has called him ‘the strongest British poet now active.’ * For his part, Hill addressed some of the misperceptions about his political and cultural beliefs in a Guardian interview in 2002. There he suggested that his affection for the “radical Tories” of the 19th century, while recently misunderstood as reactionary, was actually evidence of a progressive bent tracing back to his working class roots. He also indicated that he could no longer draw a firm distinction between “Blairite Labour” and the Thatcher-era Conservatives, lamenting that both parties had become solely oriented toward “materialism”. * Hill’s style has also been subject to parody: Wendy Cope includes a two-stanza parody of the Mercian Hymns entitled “Duffa Rex” in Making Cocoa for Kingsley Amis. Bibliography Poetry collections * For the Unfallen (1959) * Preghiere (1964) * King Log (1968) * Mercian Hymns (1971) * Somewhere Is Such a Kingdom: Poems 1952-1971 (1975) * Tenebrae (1978) * The Mystery of the Charity of Charles Péguy (1983) * New & Collected Poems, 1952-1992. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. January 2000. ISBN 0-618-00188-3. * Canaan. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 1998. ISBN 0-395-92486-3. * The Triumph of Love. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 15 December 1999. ISBN 0-618-00183-2. * Speech! Speech! (2000) - long poem, comprising 120 12-line stanzas * The Orchards of Syon (2002) * Scenes from Comus (2005) * A Treatise of Civil Power. Yale University Press. 2007. ISBN 978-0-300-13149-9. * Without Title Yale University Press. 2006, ISBN 978-0-300-12176-6. * Selected Poems. Yale University Press. 1 April 2010. ISBN 978-0-300-16430-5. * A Treatise of Civil Power (Penguin, 2007) * Oraclau | Oracles (Clutag Press, 2010) * Clavics (Enitharmon Press, 2011) * Odi Barbare (Clutag Press, 2012) * Broken Hierarchies: Poems 1952-2012. OUP Oxford. November 2013. ISBN 978-0-19-960589-7. Essay collections * The Lords of Limit (1984) * The Enemy’s Country (1991) * Style and Faith (2003) * Collected Critical Writings (2008) References Wikipedia—https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Hill

Fernando de Herrera

Fernando de Herrera fue yn poeta español nacido en Sevilla en 1534 y muerto en su ciudad natal en 1597. Por la perfección formal que alcanzó su poesía, depositaria de los ecos postrimeros de la herencia petrarquista recogida y difundida por Boscán y Garcilaso, fue conocido entre sus coetáneos por el sobrenombre de “El Divino”. Vida Pocos datos conocemos acerca de la vida de este poeta del siglo XVI español. Nació en Sevilla, hijo de honrados padres, posiblemente hidalgos. No sabemos con seguridad dónde estudió; pudo hacerlo en el colegio fundado por Maese Rodrigo Fernández de Santaella, reconocido por la ciudad de Sevilla como Colegio de Santa María de Jesús; también existe la posibilidad de que lo hiciera en el Estudio de San Miguel. Lo que sí se puede afirmar con certeza es que no debió de terminar los estudios, pues no logró ninguno de los títulos académicos que, sin duda, habría añadido a su nombre. Recibió las Órdenes Menores de Ostiario, Lector, Exorcista y Acólito, lo que le permitió solicitar y obtener un beneficio en la parroquia de San Andrés en Sevilla. Sus obligaciones se limitaban a cantar en el coro, a leer su breviario y a asistir con su vestimenta eclesiástica a una misa dominical o diaria. En 1565 trasladaron definitivamente su residencia a Sevilla don Álvaro de Portugal, conde de Gelves, y su esposa doña Leonor de Milán. El Conde auspició una tertulia literaria a la que asistían, entre otros, Juan de Mal Lara, el licenciado Pacheco, Baltasar del Alcázar, Juan de la Cueva, Mosquera de Figueroa, y el propio Herrera. La Condesa causó un gran impacto en Herrera, quien la convirtió en el centro de su poesía amatoria. La relación entre la noble y el poeta fue de gran confianza, pues doña Leonor lo hizo depositario de su testamento. Los últimos años de su vida los pasó calladamente en la ciudad de Sevilla, donde murió en 1597, a los 63 años de edad. Fue un hombre de una gran cultura, como atestigua su biógrafo Pacheco: tuvo lección particular de los santos, supo las matemáticas y la geografía, como parte principal, con gran eminencia. También poseía conocimientos de filosofía y de medicina. Era además un gran conocedor de las lenguas y literaturas griega y latina; en esta última escribió algunas composiciones, como recordaba Francisco de Rioja: “supo la lengua latina muy bien, y hizo en ella muchos epigramas, llenos de arte y de pensamientos y modos de hablar, escogidos en los más ilustres escritos antiguos”. Obra El catálogo de sus obras incluye dos grupos: obras conservadas y obras perdidas. El primero se reduce a cuatro libros en prosa: Relación de la guerra de Chipre, y suceso de la batalla naval de Lepanto, publicada en Sevilla por Picardo en 1572, que contiene al final uno de los poemas más famosos del vate sevillano, la "Canción en homenaje a don Juan de Austria por el triunfo de Lepanto"; Tomás Moro, vida ejemplar del santo inglés, impresa en Sevilla en 1592 por Alonso de la Barrera; Las Obras de Garcilaso de la Vega con Anotaciones de Fernando de Herrera (Sevilla, 1580), considerado por Antonio Alatorre como "el libro más hermoso de crítica literaria y de erudición poética que se escribió en la España del Siglo de Oro". Se trata de un libro en el que se edita con comentario la obra poética de Garcilaso, pero en él se halla un compendio de creación poética, de retórica y de crítica literaria, a lo que hay que añadir una amplia erudición enciclopédica y un esbozo del arte poética que nunca escribió. Obra muy relacionada con esta última, aunque no fue impresa en vida del poeta es la Respuesta a las Observaciones del Prete Jacopín, en la que Herrera se defiende de los ataques que contra las Anotaciones había lanzado el Condestable de Castilla. A estas obras en prosa hay que añadir su libro de poesías, publicado en Sevilla en 1582 bajo el título de Algunas obras, libro que contiene 91 composiciones desglosadas de la siguiente manera: 78 sonetos, 7 elegías, 5 odas y una égloga. A estas obras hay que añadir poemas sueltos escritos para los preliminares de libros de amigos suyos, y un gran número de composiciones que se han conservado en manuscritos dispersos en distintas bibliotecas. De las obras perdidas tenemos noticias gracias a las citas que de ellas hacen el propio Herrera, Pacheco, Francisco Rioja o el Licenciado Duarte. Pacheco, en la semblanza biográfica que acompaña a su Libro de descripción de verdaderos retratos de ilustres y memorables varones, cita varias de estas obras: un poema trágico de los "Amores de Lausino y Corona", varias églogas, la Gigantomachia, la traducción del Rapto de Proserpina de Claudiano, y, por último, una historia general del mundo hasta el reinado de Carlos V; a este catálogo, Francisco Rioja añadió un Amadís. Algunas de estas obras nunca llegaron a terminarse y algunas quizás ni siquiera a escribirse. Ninguno de sus amigos y biógrafos nos da noticias de lo que sucedió con estos textos herrerianos, aunque Pacheco y el Licenciado Duarte hablan de una usurpación, pero sin especificar el autor o autores de semejante robo o destrucción. La parte más importante de su producción literaria es, sin lugar a dudas, la poesía; es gracias a ella que Herrera ocupa un lugar destacado en la literatura española. Tal y como correspondía a un poeta de su época, el vate sevillano transitó diversos temas: poesía amorosa, poesía heroico-patriótica y poesía laudatoria. La tradición poética en la que se inserta la poesía amorosa de Herrera participa del petrarquismo, del neoplatonismo y de los tratados filográficos, como los Diálogos de amor de León Hebreo. Las tres corrientes de pensamiento aparecen recogidas en el Canzoniere de Petrarca, poeta cuya influencia en la poesía española del Siglo de Oro es fundamental; Herrera es quizás el poeta español más consciente de la importancia del escritor florentino. Por ello la poesía del sevillano se halla impregnada de conceptos y temas petrarquistas, que en ocasiones coinciden con los planteamientos neoplatónicos, e incluso con la tradición cortés iniciada en Provenza en el siglo XII. Uno de los rasgos petrarquistas que penetró en la práctica herreriana, aunque ya se había dado en nuestro siglo XV y en autores posteriores (Garcilaso), es el concepto del amor por destino: el poeta ya desde su nacimiento está destinado a amar a una mujer. Herrera creía haber nacido bajo el signo del amor, y así lo manifiesta en algunos de sus versos, como se puede apreciar en los dos versos de un soneto, en el que leemos: "Nací yo por ventura destinado / al amoroso fuego". Pero este destino no presupone una vida feliz, puesto que el amor petrarquista -y aquí se aprecia la influencia cortés- significa dolor. La amada rechaza al poeta, que es consciente de que los sentimientos que siente y expresa a la mujer que ama nunca serán correspondidos; amar es sufrir. De esta forma el dolor se convierte en el sustituto del placer, el amante se entrega a la amada en espera de recibir más tormento; su libertad, su voluntad se han rendido a la libertad y a la voluntad de la mujer. Este sometimiento absoluto culmina con un deseo de total sacrificio, que va a desembocar en la muerte. A este sentimiento se llega por el estado de angustia y desesperación en que vive el poeta, que provocan en él un estado de desconcierto y confusión obsesivos; la confusión y el desconcierto los expresa así Herrera: "Sigo por un desierto no tratado, / sin luz, sin guía, en confusión perdido". Otro de los conceptos petrarquistas es el de la consideración de la amada como guía, como la luz que conduce al poeta hacia el cielo. Siguiendo esta tradición el poeta sevillano la denomina como Luz, Estrella, Lumbre, Lucero, Sirena; todos nombres que pertenecen al campo semántico de luz. Es la luz que, dentro de la filosofía neoplatónica, guía la ascensión del amante, ascensión que en Herrera es descrita con la simbología de la literatura mística: "Y la frágil corteza dejo al suelo que impide con su peso el leve vuelo; y contemplo por vos la suma alteza, el celestial espíritu y la gloria de la inmortal belleza, y a vos os debo aquesta gran victoria". Pero esta espiritualidad expresada con un lenguaje sacado de la tradición mística no supone el desechar la sensualidad. En este sentido, Herrera refleja el pensamiento de los filósofos neoplatónicos que, como Plotino, veían en el contacto sexual una aceptable forma de expresar los sentimientos amorosos. En su poesía hallamos referencia a los besos como una forma de expresar esa comunicación que debe establecerse entre los amantes. La obra que mejor refleja la compenetración herreriana con el mundo poético petrarquista es Algunas obras, poemario publicado en 1582 en Sevilla. En este libro, Herrera asimiló perfectamente el significado del Canzoniere como historia amorosa; hasta tal punto se ha producido esa asimilación que Gallego Morell lo considera como reducido "Cancionero en honor de Madonna Leonor". Varios son los puntos de contacto entre ambos cancioneros: en primer lugar, los poemas siguen una secuencia narrativa y no cronológica; en segundo lugar, se intercalan poemas laudatorios y heroico-patrióticos para definir la personalidad y el momento histórico del escritor; en tercer lugar, hay alternancia de formas métricas, y, por último, aparece una única amada, fijada en parónimos. La principal característica de este cancionero es su concepto de historia amorosa. El primer punto a destacar es la veracidad o fingimiento de la pasión herreriana hacia doña Leonor de Milán. Ya desde el Cancionero de Baena se exigía al auténtico poeta "que siempre se precie e se finja de ser enamorado". Los filógrafos neoplatónicos repitieron la misma idea; León Hebreo escribió que "en el mundo carece de ser quien carece de amor". Por tanto, el amor que Herrera manifiesta hacia su Luz es un amor literario, vivido en la poesía. El poeta sevillano, para seguir la tradición literaria petrarquista, continuada en España por Garcilaso, necesitaba crear una amada que compitiese con la Laura de Petrarca o la Isabel garcilasiana. Por ello surgió Luz, alter ego literario de doña Leonor de Milán, como centro del universo poético herreriano. Esta historia de amor se inicia, de acuerdo al canon petrarquista, con un soneto-prólogo escrito desde la madurez sentimental y humana y con conciencia de haber errado en su pasión. Pero a diferencia de Petrarca, que escribe su poema desde una pasión ya superada y con una intención moralizante, Herrera se halla inmerso en la suya y no demuestra ningún deseo de claudicación: "Sigo al fin mi furor, porque mudarme / no es honra ya, ni justo que s’estime / tan mal de quien tan bien rindió su pecho". Este primer poema muestra ya las dos pasiones que van a convivir a lo largo del poemario: la audacia y el temor. Lo que falta en esta primera etapa de la historia amorosa es la referencia a las circunstancias en que se produjo el primer encuentro entre el poeta y su amada; poema que debía recordar al "Era il giorno ch’al sol si scoloraro" petrarquista. Eso sí, Herrera se sirve de los tópicos del florentino para narrar su rendición: el hielo, es vencido por el fuego que desprende la amada, y el poeta arde en él mísero y engañado, sin esperanza. La primera parte del libro aparece dominada por una actitud de súplica; Herrera implora a la amada su atención, su mirada, como medio de aliviar su tormento: "Vuelve tu luz a mí, vuelve tus ojos, / antes que quede oscuro en ciega niebla". Pero la respuesta esperada no llega. Estos poemas constituyen un extenso monólogo; no hay comunicación entre el poeta y su amada; ésta no tiene voz, es únicamente receptora de las amargas quejas de su amante. El silencio se rompe sólo en la elegía III, momento culminante de la narración amorosa, cuando Luz le declara su amor y los tormentos que por él está sufriendo. Es el momento de la euforia, de la victoria del poeta que ve de esta manera recompensados sus tormentos. Para destacar más esa sensación de triunfo, el poeta la hace coincidir con el momento en que la armada de don Juan de Austria, vencedora en Lepanto, se halla fondeada en el puerto sevillano. A partir de este momento, se da una tensión amorosa entre la esperanza y el desengaño. Este proceso culmina en el soneto XXXIII, "Ardientes hebras, do s’ilustra el oro", en el que se produce la exaltación de la belleza de la amada, con alusiones al cabello, a los ojos, a las mejillas, a los dientes, al cuello y, por último, a su "angélica armonía". Pero esta tensión se rompe pronto y desparece la esperanza, quedándole sólo al amante el recuerdo del placer pasajero. Al recuerdo de la gloria le acompañan el dolor y el desengaño ante la crueldad de la amada. Recurre entonces, para demostrar la grandeza de su tormento, al mito de Prometeo (soneto XLVI), aunque su suplicio es más doloroso que el de este héroe mitológico, puesto que es su corazón el que es comido y no existe ningún Hércules que pueda liberarle. A partir de aquí el poeta, que pretende recuperar su libertad, se halla inmerso en una lucha entre la razón y la pasión, que provoca una gran confusión de la que sólo se libera en el soneto final. En él Herrera narra la ruptura de su yo poético con el amor: "No más; baste, cruel, ya en tantos años rendido haber al yugo el cuello yerto, y haber visto en el fin tu desvarío. Abra la luz la niebla a tus engaños, antes que el lazo rompa el tiempo, y muerto sea el fuego del tardo hielo mío". Esta composición cierra el cancionero herreriano. Pero faltan en él los poemas in morte. No sabemos la razón de esta ausencia; quizás nunca fueran escritos o sí lo fueron, pero al tratarse de una antología representativa de su producción poética pudieron quedar fuera. Otra corriente poética que trató el amor fue el de la poesía cancioneril castellana del siglo XV, cuyo mejor ejemplo es el Cancionero general de Hernando del Castillo, impreso por primera vez en 1511, pero que pervivió en la tradición poética castellana del siglo XVI. Las razones que movieron a Herrera a continuar esta tradición fueron dos: por una parte, la idea renacentista de continuar una tradición nacional; por otra, el deseo de demostrar su perfecto dominio de la técnica poética, necesaria para desarrollar este tipo de lírica en la que se buscaba el virtuosismo formal. Las dos vertientes, la petrarquista y la cancioneril, no representan dos polos opuestos, sino que son complementarias; cada una de ellas influirá en la otra, aunque ambas conservan sus características distintivas. La diferencia que separa ambas tendencias se halla en el sentimiento que el poeta es capaz de comunicar a través de ellas. En su obra petrarquista hay una pasión vivida, aunque ésta sea literaria, elemento que falta en su poesía en metros castellanos. El lector no siente la autenticidad vital en estos poemas; todo parece quedarse en un mero juego poético, en la búsqueda de la perfección formal. Herrera incorpora a esta poesía su saber humanístico y su extenso conocimiento de la labor de los poetas del siglo XV, pero no penetra en la poesía, no deja su huella personal, sus propias emociones. Refleja, en cambio, de manera obediente las normas del amor cortés. Así, conceptos como el amor considerado como servicio del amante hacia la amada, el secreto, la dama presentada como la "belle dame sans merci", la lucha entre la razón y la pasión que termina con el triunfo de la segunda, son rescatados por Herrera en estas poesías. Otra de las vertientes poéticas que transitó fue la de la poesía heroico-patriótica. Las razones que le hicieron abordar este tipo fueron dos: en primer lugar, por la tradición del canzoniere petrarquista, que se servía de ella para fijar la temporalidad histórica de la peripecia amorosa; en segundo lugar, porque la poesía épica, ya desde la Poética de Aristóteles, era considerada como el género más prestigioso. El propio Herrera se refiere a esta última causa en uno de sus poemas, en el que reconoce la superioridad de la obra épica de Homero o Virgilio sobre la poesía amorosa de Tíbulo, aunque en el poema reconoce la imposibilidad de apartar su inspiración de su amada. Por otra parte, en sus poemas nos encontramos con una mezcla de elementos heroicos en la poesía amatoria y líricos en la heroica, como símbolo de una concepción que señalaba ambos procesos como igualmente gloriosos. Herrera era consciente del concepto pindárico de la poesía como inmortalizadora de las gestas heroicas, y por ello emprendió, dentro del fervor nacionalista del Renacimiento, la labor de rescatar del olvido las hazañas de algunos héroes medievales españoles: Pelayo, Fernán González, el Cid, Gonzalo Fernández de Córdoba. Pero la enumeración y la exaltación no se detienen en el pasado, sino que entre todos los héroes emerge la figura de don Juan de Austria, el vencedor de Lepanto. También escribió encendidos elogios de Carlos V y de Felipe II, a los que exalta por sus luchas contra los enemigos de Dios, dentro del concepto de la época que veía en España la cabeza de la Cristiandad. Los estudiosos de la obra de Herrera han apreciado en este género poético una progresión gradual desde la predominante aparición de motivos mitológicos hasta una completa cristianización, representada por el uso exclusivo de temas y motivos bíblicos. Esta progresión no es lineal, puesto que el hito intermedio ("Canción al Santo Rey don Fernando"), en el que los elementos mitológicos van desapareciendo, fue escrita casi diez años más tarde que la "Canción en alabanza de la divina magestad, por la victoria del señor don Juan", que representa el triunfo de la cristianización de esta poesía. Los dos poemas más importantes en este género son "Cantemos al Señor, que en la llanura", dedicada a la victoria de Lepanto, y "Voz de dolor y canto de gemido", que narra el desastre portugués en Alcazarquivir. Las dos composiciones reflejan el espíritu español de la Contrarreforma, en el que se unen un fuerte sentimiento patriótico y una severa religiosidad. En ambas aparece dominando la narración la figura magnífica de Dios; de un Dios guerrero que imparte justicia contra los enemigos de la fe: "Tú, Dios de las batallas, tú eres diestra, / salud y gloria nuestra". Sin embargo, este Dios guerrero e implacable no sólo castiga a los enemigos de la fe, sino que también lo hace con los malos cristianos; de esta manera explica la derrota del rey portugués don Sebastián frente a los moros en el Norte de África, aunque el poema termina con un aviso para los árabes vencedores: "que si el justo dolor mueve a venganza / alguna vez el español coraje, / despedazada con aguda lanza, / compensarás, muriendo, el hecho ultraje". La misma tradición poética que obligaba a Herrera a componer poesías de tema heroico le obligaba también a escribir poemas laudatorios. Los teóricos de la literatura de los siglos XVI y XVII respaldaban esta práctica, pues consideraban que la alabanza era una de las funciones básicas del arte poético. También se basaba en una tradición que hundía sus raíces en la literatura greco-latina, que había sido continuada en la Edad Media y estaba dotada de un nuevo significado por el Renacimiento. Este nuevo significado se hallaba en la revitalización renacentista de la idea de la fama, que contribuyó al auge de la literatura panegírica. Según esta tradición, el poeta debía inmortalizar a sus amigos y a los héroes contemporáneos. El problema con el que nos enfrentamos al analizar la poesía laudatoria de Herrera es el de establecer unos límites precisos entre ésta y la heroica; los poemas en que se realzan los méritos de los generales o de los soldados españoles reflejan ideas que pueden encuadrarse en cualquiera de las dos categorías poéticas: por una parte, hay en ellos una alabanza a las virtudes individuales del personaje celebrado; por otra, esos valores representan la encarnación de los ideales políticos y religiosos de la colectividad. La retórica clásica codificó los hechos y personajes que merecían ser elogiados por los poetas con la característica común de su imagen ilustre. Muchos son los tipos encuadrados en esta poesía laudatoria, aunque un corto número de ellos se encuentra en la obra de Herrera: epitalámicos, propémpticos, consolatorios y encomiásticos. En su poesía, el grupo más importante lo constituyen aquellos en que se alaban las virtudes de sus amigos o protectores; es decir, los encomiásticos, con los que el poeta pretende enumerar las virtudes del personaje y, al mismo tiempo, intenta mover a los lectores. Así, los poemas dedicados a doña Francisca de Córdoba, marquesa de Gibraleón, o a don Melchor Maldonado, caballero de la Orden de Santiago se hallan en el grupo de los encomiásticos. Otro de los tipos que cultivó es el consolatorio (elegías, trenos, endechas, epicedios). Aquí se unen la descripción de las cualidades del amigo muerto, la concepción del mundo como un valle de lágrimas y la consolatio; ejemplos representativos de este grupo son: la elegía a la muerte de don Pedro de Zúñiga, la dedicada a Luis Ponce de León o la composición en la que llora la muerte de su maestro y amigo Juan de Mal Lara, en la que deja constancia de los lazos que los unían: "de mi alma murió la mayor parte". El último de los grupos que abordó es el de la poesía epitalámica, que se destinaba a la celebración de las nupcias con el elogio de los esposos, de sus familias, de las virtudes de los contrayentes, etc; el ejemplo más interesante de Herrera es el poema que compuso con motivo del matrimonio del marqués de Tarifa, en el que la alabanza al novio incluye la referencia a sus gloriosos antepasados y a sus virtudes, y en el caso de la novia se la presenta, siguiendo la filosofía neoplatónica, como luz que guía al amante a las esferas del cielo, ayudándole a levantarse sobre la oscuridad. Fernando de Herrera no se limitó a escribir poesía, sino que además se dedicó a estudiar la poesía. De esta preocupación teórica nos ha dejado importantes ejemplos: las Anotaciones, la Respuesta al prete Jacopín, y comentarios desperdigados en elgunos de sus poemas. A estas obras habría que añadir esa Arte poética que se quedó en proyecto. Herrera expone en estas obras sus ideas acerca de las teorías literarias, del lenguaje poético, de los distintos géneros, de las formas métricas, de los poetas clásicos y de los contemporáneos. Pero no hallamos entre sus ideas, entre sus comentarios conceptos originales; él resume distintas tradiciones literarias filtradas a través de Julio César Escalígero y recurre a la terminología de la retórica, como ya sucedía desde la antigüedad clásica. El proceso de creación poética herreriano se debate entre la manía o inspiración platónica y la reflexión aristotélica. En varios pasajes de sus obras parece abrazar la doctrina platónica de la inspiración divina como causa eficiente de la poesía, pero acaba por imponerse en su concepción su intelectualismo y la obra de arte se convierte en un objeto elaborado. Son las reglas del arte las que se imponen en su concepto poético de acuerdo a la norma manierista. El arte es el guía del artista; es el triunfo de la mímesis aristotélica. Sigue así Herrera la tradición de la imitación que había surgido ya en Horacio, que defendía la imitación múltiple o la famosa frase de Séneca: "Apes, ut aiunt, debemus imitari". Pero también sigue el concepto humanista que reconocía el valor artístico de la imitación como una muestra de sabiduría poética y de respeto a la tradición culta. En Herrera se manifiesta una insatisfacción ante la tradición recibida, lo que le lanza a la búsqueda de nuevos conceptos y elementos poéticos, tal y como lo manifiesta en sus Anotaciones: "no todos los pensamientos y consideraciones de amor, y de las más cosas que toca la poesía cayeron en la mente del Petrarca y del Bembo y de los antiguos". Por tanto, la propuesta del sevillano consiste en una voz personal que combina la recepción de los logros poéticos de los escritores anteriores -la mimesis- con sus propios hallazgos. Una vía para alcanzar esta voz personal la constituye la erudición. Para Herrera, el poeta debe poseer extensos conocimientos en las más diversas ciencias. De esta forma, se explica la abundancia de datos eruditos en sus Anotaciones, perfecto vehículo para demostrar su talla intelectual. En su obra poética también se encuentran múltiples referencias a la mitología clásica, a la geografía, filosofía, medicina, historia, astrología, etc. A ellos hay que unir sus amplios conocimientos de Retórica y Poética, así como de las literaturas clásicas y modernas, sobre todo de la italiana. Dentro de este contexto erudito podemos situar la creación de su propio sistema ortográfico. Para Herrera, como buen manierista, el cometido esencial de la poesía es reflejar la belleza, que es trasunto de la divina. Por lo tanto, un concepto importante es el de la admiración; por ello el campo de la poesía queda limitado a lo que produce un sentimiento de maravilla en el poeta: la belleza de una mujer, la grandiosidad de una batalla, las hazañas de un héroe. Para despertar esta admiración Herrera escoge con mucho cuidado las palabras con las que va a describir lo bello; es decir, debe existir una perfecta adecuación entre el lenguaje y el tema. Él rechaza la máxima de Juan Valdés del "escribo como hablo": para Herrera, el lenguaje literario es autónomo y perfectamente diferenciado del habla común. Pero eso no implica complicación; el lenguaje no ha de oscurecer las ideas, sino que, por el contrario, ha de esclarecerlas. Para él, el español ha alcanzado la madurez y la flexibilidad necesarias para transmitir los conceptos poéticos: siguiendo el camino iniciado por Nebrija, se enorgullece de la lengua heredada, aunque no rechaza la incorporación de vocablos extranjeros siempre que se haga con una intención enriquecedora. La poética herreriana tenía como finalidades la búsqueda de la belleza y el deseo de mover al lector. Ambas son conseguidas mediante una gran preocupación estilística, propia de un poeta para quien la poesía no es sólo sentimiento, sino también placer estético. Su obra poética se debate entre la creación de una poesía de formas puras, a través del uso de "palabras graves, que no se apartan del uso común", y el oscurecimiento producido en la expresión por las referencias a ideas filosóficas, a hechos históricos o a lugares geográficos, que la hacen imposible para el vulgo. El estilo herreriano refleja una búsqueda de un nuevo lenguaje poético, que sigue la herencia de Garcilaso y que culminará en el culteranismo de don Luis de Góngora. Uno de los rasgos sobresalientes de este nuevo lenguaje poético es la abundancia de metáforas, hasta tal punto que se ha llegado a hablar de que su poesía "semeja una verbena metafórica". La utilización de este tropo se encuadra dentro del estilo manierista. La metáfora herreriana apela, sobre todo, a la vista, el órgano que sirve para captar mejor el mundo de belleza que traslada la figura. Otras dos características del uso metafórico del poeta son: la ausencia de cualquier tipo de partícula comparativa, y su sencillez. Los adjetivos contribuyen a intensificar el mundo sensorial creado por las metáforas. Garcilaso había mantenido el equilibrio entre lo sustantivo y lo adjetivo, Herrera lo rompe en favor de este último. Aparecen en sus poesía los tipos tradicionales de epítetos: los típicos ("rojo sol", "luciente cielo"); selectos, matizados y antitéticos ("los fuertes y belígeros varones", "del mar cerúleo"); enfáticos ("pura estrella", "beldad serena"); epítetos en metáforas y perífrasis ("de las crespas lazadas d’oro ardiente"), y, por último, aquellos casos en que los sustantivos y nominales llevan varios adjetivos; tal es el caso del tipo, que ya aparece en Garcilaso, epíteto + y + epíteto ("con el claro español y belicoso"). El repertorio de figuras usadas por Herrera es muy variado. En la poesía en metros castellanos continúa la tradición conceptista de la poesía cancioneril que se complace en los juegos de ingenio lingüístico. Abundan las antítesis, las paradojas, y los opósitos que sirven al poeta para mostrar el estado de confusión en que se halla. Otras figuras que aparecen en estas poesías son: los políptotos y los paralelismos. La poesía de tradición italianizante también abunda en figuras retóricas. Hay que destacar el uso de aquellas que le permiten, por una parte, manifestar su dolor amoroso y su confusión, y, por otra, enfatizan sus versos. Las dos funciones las cumplen: la prosopopeya, el apóstrofe y la invocación, la exclamación y la interrogación retóricas; así como determinados recursos formales: sinéresis, diéresis, sinalefa, dialefa y anáfora. También concede especial atención a los valores de los sonidos, buscando la adecuación entre la palabra y su significado a través del valor simbólico de las letras, de las secuencias antirrítmicas y a la aliteración. También tiene gran importancia en su obra el encabalgamiento, por la libertad de expresión que concede a los poetas. Con gran profusión aparecen en sus versos los hipérbatos de distintas clases: separación de sustantivo y adjetivo; anteposición del genitivo, o de cualquier otra palabra precedida por de, al vocablo del que depende, y, por último, un sustantivo con dos adjetivos atributos, uno de los cuales se antepone y el otro se pospone. También se incluye en este grupo el acusativo griego. Otras figuras son: la perífrasis, las alusiones cultas y las citas mitológicas. El carácter de artífice con el que Herrera trabaja las figuras retóricas se refleja también en el campo léxico. Aquí intenta unir tradición y novedad: abrir la lengua a las influencias exteriores (cultismos y neologismos) y recuperar aquellos vocablos desechados por el uso común (arcaísmos). La aparición de los cultismos en Herrera tiene dos causas: la primera, el concepto erudito de su poética, por el que debía buscar vocablos nuevos con un origen clásico; la segunda, su nacionalismo, que le llevaba a acercar el español al latín, la lengua universal de la cultura. Algunos de los cultismos introducidos por Herrera forman parte hoy de nuestro vocabulario: "abundancia", "aceptar", "ameno", "elocuente", "espacioso", "hábito", etc. Las mismas causas le impulsaron a introducir multitud de neologismos. Los arcaísmos fueron usados por dos causas: le dan una patena de antigüedad a los versos, y, para el lector culto, denotan erudición y novedad. Los más usados son: "ardor", "crespo", "yerto", "ledo", "ufano", "ufanía". El aspecto de la poesía de Herrera que más controversia ha despertado es, sin duda alguna, el grado de intervención de Francisco Pacheco en la edición de los Versos de Fernando de Herrera, que vio la luz en las prensas sevillanas de Gabriel Ramos Vejarano en 1619, aunque la aprobación y el privilegio están datados en 1617; es lo que se ha denominado como el "drama textual". A la muerte del poeta, mucho de sus papeles se perdieron o estaban dispersos. Por ello, Pacheco hubo de servirse para su edición de los manuscritos y papeles sueltos que pudo rescatar entre los amigos del poeta y los coleccionistas. Esta edición presenta variantes en el lenguaje, el estilo y la estructura de algunos poemas, que la alejan bastante de Algunas obras e, incluso, de poemas anteriores a esta antología, conservados en manuscritos. El problema que se plantea es saber si Pacheco se limitó a copiar los poemas tal y como aparecían en los manuscritos que utilizó o, por el contrario, los alteró. La mayor parte de la crítica defiende la última opción: Pacheco retocó los poemas que editó. A esta conclusión se ha llegado por una serie de importantes detalles: la arcaización del lenguaje, con la aparición de palabras como "conhortar", "conquerir", "cuitoso" o "yusano", de las que no existe ningún ejemplo en Algunas obras; la división en tres libros, que, según los contemporáneos de Pacheco, es del editor y no del poeta; el hecho de que seis sonetos aparezcan copiados dos veces y que se omitan tres de los que aparecen en Algunas obras; la autoría dudosa del "prefación" que abre la edición de Pacheco; el hecho de que un verso de la elegía VIII del libro I de Versos muestre influencias de uno del Polifemo de Luis de Góngora; y las supresiones de los nombres propios en algunas poesías y la de estrofas en otras. Las Obras de Garci-Lasso de la Vega con anotaciones de Fernando de Herrera fueron publicadas en 1580, aunque parece ser que ya trabajaba en ella antes de 1571. Este comentario y edición de las obras de Garcilaso no fue el primero en ser publicado, honor que corresponde al Brocense, que había sacado el suyo en Salamanca en 1577, bajo el título de Obras del excelente poeta Garci-Lasso de la Vega. Con anotaciones y enmiendas del maestro Francisco Sánchez. Sin embargo, Herrera nunca menciona en sus Anotaciones la obra del catedrático salmantino. La labor del poeta sevillano no se limita al comentario erudito de los poemas de Garcilaso, sino que su primera función es la depuración y corrección de los textos, hecho del que se vanagloria, afirmando ser el primero que ha llevado a cabo tal tarea. Su interés difiere del manifestado por el Brocense, que había fijado las fuentes clásicas de las que se había servido Garcilaso, mientras que Herrera se interesa más por la demostración de la gran calidad de la poesía garcilasiana que compara con la de los mejores poetas de la antigüedad, y por el establecimiento de una poética que es la suya. Traza además, gracias a su erudición, un amplio panorama de los géneros poéticos y su historia, del valor de las formas métricas (y aquí hay que destacar las palabras que dedica al soneto), de las preceptivas clásicas y de las italianas de su época, y aporta juicios críticos sobre escritores españoles e italianos. Referencias UAM - www.lllf.uam.es/~fmarcos/informes/BNArgentina/catalogo/herreraf.htm




Top